From LOJBAN@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU  Sat Mar  6 22:58:45 2010
Return-Path: <LOJBAN@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU>
Delivered-To: veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI
Received: (qmail 6126 invoked from network); 18 Dec 1996 19:58:01 -0000
Received: from segate.sunet.se (192.36.125.6)
  by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with SMTP; 18 Dec 1996 19:58:01 -0000
Received: from segate.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <13.9BAFE870@SEGATE.SUNET.SE>; Wed, 18 Dec 1996 20:57:56 +0100
Date:         Wed, 18 Dec 1996 12:35:00 -0700
Reply-To:     Chris A Bogart <cbogart@INDRA.COM>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From:         Chris A Bogart <cbogart@INDRA.COM>
Subject:      Re: PLI: evidentials in reported speech
X-To:         lojban%cuvmb.bitnet@mitvma.mit.edu
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
In-Reply-To:  <199612181859.LAA13931@indra.com>
Content-Length: 420
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <ZAcvp2BuQHG.A.37B.l60kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>

On Wed, 18 Dec 1996, And Rosta wrote:
> If you wanted to report me saying "JC (phwoar!) is playing G"
> then you might say "La and said lickerishly that JC is playing
> G", for example. Same goes for Lojban.

Hmmm, would it be equivalent to say (in Lojban)

   La and said that (phwoar-dai) JC is playing G

placing the empathy-ized attitudinal after "lenu" or
between "le" and "nu"?  Or after "said", maybe?

co'o do'u