From LOJBAN@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU  Sat Mar  6 22:49:14 2010
Return-Path: <LOJBAN@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU>
Delivered-To: veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI
Received: (qmail 27477 invoked from network); 18 Apr 1997 17:51:27 -0000
Received: from segate.sunet.se (192.36.125.6)
  by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with SMTP; 18 Apr 1997 17:51:27 -0000
Received: from segate.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <15.5DB86536@SEGATE.SUNET.SE>; Fri, 18 Apr 1997 19:51:27 +0100
Date:         Fri, 18 Apr 1997 15:34:32 GMT+0
Reply-To:     And Rosta <a.rosta@UCLAN.AC.UK>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From:         And Rosta <a.rosta@UCLAN.AC.UK>
Organization: University of Central Lancashire
Subject:      Re: CPE: Corliss Lamont
X-To:         LOJBAN@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 310
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <pPkpgYWMU_D.A.-JH.qx0kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>

> It probably
> won't happen in the first edition of the dictionary, but
> I think it would be very useful if in some later edition
> we could have a full sentence under every gismu with all
> of its places filled.

Hearhear. (It wouldn't be necessary for every gismu, though,
would it? Not for "gerku", say.)