Date:  Fri, 29 Aug 1997 22:23:22 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199708300323.WAA17435@locke.ccil.org>
Reply-To: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Subject:      Re: Comparison: Loglan / Lojban ?
X-To:         mark.vines@wholefoods.com
X-cc:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
X-Mozilla-Status: 0011
Content-Length: 230
X-From-Space-Date: Fri Aug 29 22:23:23 1997
X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU

>Mark Vines responds:
>
>How should sumti raising be marked in Lojban?  I doubt that
>I am doing this correctly.

There are a few ways.  See the abstraction chapter in the refgrammar,
especially discussion of tu'a and jai.
lojbab