From LOJBAN@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU  Sat Mar  6 22:54:30 2010
Return-Path: <LOJBAN@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU>
Delivered-To: veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI
Received: (qmail 16831 invoked from network); 30 Aug 1997 02:12:45 -0000
Received: from segate.sunet.se (192.36.125.6)
  by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with SMTP; 30 Aug 1997 02:12:45 -0000
Received: from segate.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <14.68613D28@SEGATE.SUNET.SE>; Sat, 30 Aug 1997 4:12:34 +0100
Date:         Fri, 29 Aug 1997 22:11:50 -0400
Reply-To:     Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From:         Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Subject:      Re: Comparison: Loglan / Lojban ?
X-To:         mark.vines@wholefoods.com
X-cc:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 230
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <XbbfClPxwRD.A.iw.m20kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>

>Mark Vines responds:
>
>How should sumti raising be marked in Lojban?  I doubt that
>I am doing this correctly.

There are a few ways.  See the abstraction chapter in the refgrammar,
especially discussion of tu'a and jai.
lojbab