From LOJBAN@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU Sat Mar 6 22:53:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI Received: (qmail 31981 invoked from network); 24 Sep 1997 02:38:05 -0000 Received: from segate.sunet.se (192.36.125.6) by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with SMTP; 24 Sep 1997 02:38:05 -0000 Received: from segate.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <3.169FD69A@SEGATE.SUNET.SE>; Wed, 24 Sep 1997 4:37:54 +0100 Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 12:35:19 +1000 Reply-To: HACKER G N Sender: Lojban list From: HACKER G N Subject: Re: RV: na'e entails na? To: John Cowan Cc: Lojban List In-Reply-To: <0EGZ00N6K4IV4Q@newcastle.edu.au> Content-Length: 521 Lines: 14 Message-ID: On Tue, 23 Sep 1997, John Cowan wrote: > JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS wrote: > > > Could you give a sentence with your definition of na'e as > > a selbri modifier that says something useful? > > No. I retract my arguments, and move to the Jorge/lojbab > camp. Yes, I go to the Jorge/lojbab camp too, subject to your proviso that the positive statement implied by "na'e" must be related to the negative statement along some intelligible scale. (If it weren't, one wouldn't be able to make much sense of "to'e", for example.)