From LOJBAN@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU Sat Mar 6 22:53:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI Received: (qmail 11317 invoked from network); 25 Sep 1997 00:47:36 -0000 Received: from segate.sunet.se (192.36.125.6) by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with SMTP; 25 Sep 1997 00:47:36 -0000 Received: from segate.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <11.D24B8781@SEGATE.SUNET.SE>; Thu, 25 Sep 1997 2:47:26 +0100 Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 10:46:01 +1000 Reply-To: HACKER G N Sender: Lojban list From: HACKER G N Subject: Re: RV: na'e entails na? To: And Rosta Cc: Lojban List In-Reply-To: <0EH000DGPP220W@newcastle.edu.au> Content-Length: 746 Lines: 18 Message-ID: On Wed, 24 Sep 1997, And Rosta wrote: > For example, everyone is either citizen of France or citizen of > some other country. [NB INCLUSIVE OR] I want to describe > the latter group as "na`e fraso zei selgugde" [I'm taking x1 of > selgugde to be a citizen]. But since for example someone can be a > citizen of both France and Britain, "na`e fraso zei selgugde" > would not work if it entails "na fraso zei selgugde". "na fraso > ..." gives me everyone who isn't French, whereas I want > everyone who is a citizen of a country other than France. > For that I would like to use "na`e fraso", but will not be > able to if everyone bar me gets their way! Why not just use "drata"? Surely examples like this are part of what it's meant for. Geoff