Message-ID: <3422C4D6.5725@locke.ccil.org> Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 14:30:46 -0400 From: John Cowan Organization: Lojban Peripheral X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (WinNT; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lojban List Subject: Re: Morphology References: <199709191504.KAA03305@locke.ccil.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 Content-Length: 622 X-From-Space-Date: Fri Sep 19 14:30:46 1997 X-From-Space-Address: - Don Wiggins wrote: > > > But it is forbidden to stress a cmavo syllable before a gismu unless you > > put a compulsory pause after the cmavo, so strong disambiguation is > > maintained. > > Is that right? In fact, is it stronger in that before gismu or lujvo there > must be a pause? How about cmene? A stressed cmavo must be separated from any following brivla by a pause. For cmene, the rule is much stronger: ANY preceding word, except for "la", "lai", "la'i", and "doi", must be separated from a following cmene by a pause. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org e'osai ko sarji la lojban