Date:  Wed, 24 Sep 1997 01:58:14 -0500 (EST)
          id BAA05184 for cowan@ccil.org; Wed, 24 Sep 1997 01:43:39 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 01:43:39 -0400 (EDT)
From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@access.digex.net>
Message-Id: <199709240543.BAA05184@access2.digex.net>
To: cowan@ccil.org
Subject:     Re: RV: na'e entails na? 
X-Mozilla-Status: 0011
Content-Length: 333
X-From-Space-Date: Wed Sep 24 01:58:19 1997
X-From-Space-Address: lojbab@access.digex.net


>JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS wrote:
>
>> Could you give a sentence with your definition of na'e as
>> a selbri modifier that says something useful?
>
>No.  I retract my arguments, and move to the Jorge/lojbab
>camp.

I ahven't been keeping up.  I thought Jorge disagreed with me, or was that
only about to'e and not about na'e? 

lojbab