Message-Id: <199709231600.LAA15092@locke.ccil.org>
Reply-To: And Rosta <a.rosta@UCLAN.AC.UK>
Date: Tue Sep 23 11:00:37 1997
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: And Rosta <a.rosta@UCLAN.AC.UK>
Organization: University of Central Lancashire
Subject:      Pharisees of the Book of Woldemar
X-To:         LOJBAN@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
Content-Length: 472
X-From-Space-Date: Tue Sep 23 11:00:37 1997
X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU

Lee writes:
>     I think Lojban should choose the stronger
>     and more useful interpretation here, even though it is too late to
>     clarify this issue in the books.  That's what errata sheets are for.

Bad idea. The book is now the bible - errata sheets are for typos,
not for substantive changes.
I myself was never in favour of the legislative status of
the book, but LLG has promised that this will be so.

So we are now turned into pharisaical exegetes.

--And