From LOJBAN@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU  Sat Mar  6 22:53:59 2010
Return-Path: <LOJBAN@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU>
Delivered-To: veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI
Received: (qmail 18162 invoked from network); 26 Sep 1997 02:48:04 -0000
Received: from segate.sunet.se (192.36.125.6)
  by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with SMTP; 26 Sep 1997 02:48:04 -0000
Received: from segate.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <5.D07520A4@SEGATE.SUNET.SE>; Fri, 26 Sep 1997 4:47:53 +0100
Date:         Sun, 21 Sep 1997 07:36:43 -0300
Reply-To:     JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS <jorge@INTERMEDIA.COM.AR>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From:         JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS <jorge@INTERMEDIA.COM.AR>
Subject:      na'enai
X-To:         lojban <lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu>
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 631
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <d5iN7Sc5OBJ.A.Qn.H20kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>

And:
>Specifically, we need to be sure that "na broda po`o" does NOT
>entail "na broda".

It seems to me from this discussion that the meaning of "only",
(at least one of its meanings) belongs right next to the meaning
of "non-", because both require a hard to define "relevant set",
so in fact there should be a NAhE that means that. (Something
from UI seems a bit messy for this.) I suggest that what we need
here is {na'enai}:

                ti na'e fraso
                This one is non-French.

                ta na'enai fraso
                That one is only-French.  (i.e. not non-French.)

Any takers?

co'o mi'e xorxes