From LOJBAN@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU  Sat Mar  6 22:54:05 2010
Return-Path: <LOJBAN@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU>
Delivered-To: veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI
Received: (qmail 19519 invoked from network); 17 Sep 1997 03:19:59 -0000
Received: from segate.sunet.se (192.36.125.6)
  by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with SMTP; 17 Sep 1997 03:19:59 -0000
Received: from segate.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <12.C8739706@SEGATE.SUNET.SE>; Wed, 17 Sep 1997 5:19:49 +0100
Date:         Tue, 16 Sep 1997 23:16:28 -0400
Reply-To:     Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From:         Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Subject:      Re: "lojbab"
X-To:         c9709244@ALINGA.NEWCASTLE.EDU.AU
X-cc:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 269
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <4DqO24lO6uC.A.6o.N20kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>

>Our
>English spelling for the Lojban word "lojbab" would presumably be
>something like "lozhbub"! :)

I hope not.  The unstressed "a" in "lojbab" should not be reduced to a schwa.
Thus I (try to) pronounce my Lojbanized name as something like "l-oh-zh-b-ah-b"

lojbab