From - Thu Sep 25 16:26:21 1997 Message-ID: <342AC8ED.5F15@locke.ccil.org> Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 16:26:21 -0400 From: John Cowan Organization: Lojban Peripheral X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (WinNT; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lojban List Subject: Re: RV: na'e entails na? References: <199709251759.MAA11961@locke.ccil.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 Content-Length: 634 la .and. cusku di'e > la xorxes. cusku di'e > > Ok, once again I have been persuaded by And to change my > > mind. My position now is that na'e by itself does not entail na. > > It only does so when the selbri in question partitions its domain > > into exclusive regions (I try to explain what I mean by this below). > I am happy to go along with this as the final verdict on > {na`e}, but I do note that now that Don has brought "na ... po`o" > into the arena the necessity of that verdict may be > diminished. mi go'i -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org e'osai ko sarji la lojban