From LOJBAN@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU Sat Mar 6 22:53:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI Received: (qmail 11446 invoked from network); 25 Sep 1997 01:32:07 -0000 Received: from segate.sunet.se (192.36.125.6) by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with SMTP; 25 Sep 1997 01:32:07 -0000 Received: from segate.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <10.0A26DFEC@SEGATE.SUNET.SE>; Thu, 25 Sep 1997 3:31:57 +0100 Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 06:20:51 -0300 Reply-To: JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS Sender: Lojban list From: JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS Subject: Re: LE and VOI X-To: lojban To: Veijo Vilva Content-Length: 646 Lines: 18 Message-ID: <_cXsfOc0LRD.A.-h.210kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org> cu'u la djef > We can't express specificity and veridicality, but we can >expres non-specificity and NON-veridicality! We can express specificity and veridicality in several ways: le mlatu noi mlatu cu blabi The cat, which btw really is a cat, is white. ro mlatu poi mi fi ke'a tavla cu blabi Each of the really-is-a-cat that I'm talking about are white. but I don't see any need to stress that we really are talking about a real cat, since that will be the default assumption. Context has to clearly indicate otherwise for {le mlatu} to refer to something that is not a cat. co'o mi'e xorxes