From LOJBAN@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU  Sat Mar  6 22:53:46 2010
Return-Path: <LOJBAN@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU>
Delivered-To: veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI
Received: (qmail 20490 invoked from network); 26 Sep 1997 14:14:05 -0000
Received: from segate.sunet.se (192.36.125.6)
  by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with SMTP; 26 Sep 1997 14:14:05 -0000
Received: from segate.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <5.A648940E@SEGATE.SUNET.SE>; Fri, 26 Sep 1997 16:13:54 +0100
Date:         Fri, 26 Sep 1997 15:12:33 BST
Reply-To:     Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From:         Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
Subject:      Re: ja`a/na go`i
X-To:         LOJBAN@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 226
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <GlZURYEvJKE.A.bj.610kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>

> In this example, "go`i" = "na broda", "na go`i" = "na broda",
> and "ja`a go`i" = "broda". So it's not as bad as you feared.

Phew!  That was one of those '"I hadn't though of that" and disappearing in a
puff logic' things.