From LOJBAN@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU  Sat Mar  6 22:53:48 2010
Return-Path: <LOJBAN@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU>
Delivered-To: veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI
Received: (qmail 14987 invoked from network); 25 Sep 1997 11:08:18 -0000
Received: from segate.sunet.se (192.36.125.6)
  by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with SMTP; 25 Sep 1997 11:08:18 -0000
Received: from segate.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <11.87E98D08@SEGATE.SUNET.SE>; Thu, 25 Sep 1997 13:08:08 +0100
Date:         Thu, 25 Sep 1997 11:12:32 BST
Reply-To:     Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From:         Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
Subject:      Re: RV: na'e entails na?
X-To:         LOJBAN@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 570
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <bxs2lFIwe5I.A.kj.810kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>

la .and cusku di'e
> I know that "na broda .ije ja`a go`i" is defined as a contradiction
> rather than a tautology, because "ja`a" substitutes for "na"
> rather than taking "na broda" within its scope.

I didn't know that "na broda .ije ja`a go`i" is defined as a contradiction.
Does this mean that "go'i" = "broda" in this case?

> But is the
> same true of NA`E? (I think you're right, but want confirmation.)

> >     .i .abu by. cy. na broda .ije na'ego'i

This would only be true if "go'i" = "broda", but I'm not sure that it is.  Very
confusing.

ni'oco'omi'e dn.