From LOJBAN@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU Thu Sep 25 23:03:20 1997
Message-Id: <199709260403.XAA05409@locke.ccil.org>
Date: Thu Sep 25 23:03:20 1997
Reply-To: JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS <jorge@INTERMEDIA.COM.AR>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS <jorge@INTERMEDIA.COM.AR>
Subject:      na'enai
X-To:         lojban <lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu>
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
X-Mozilla-Status: 0005
Content-Length:  655


And:
>Specifically, we need to be sure that "na broda po`o" does NOT
>entail "na broda".

It seems to me from this discussion that the meaning of "only",
(at least one of its meanings) belongs right next to the meaning
of "non-", because both require a hard to define "relevant set",
so in fact there should be a NAhE that means that. (Something
from UI seems a bit messy for this.) I suggest that what we need
here is {na'enai}:

                ti na'e fraso
                This one is non-French.

                ta na'enai fraso
                That one is only-French.  (i.e. not non-French.)

Any takers?

co'o mi'e xorxes