From LOJBAN@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU Sat Mar 6 22:53:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI Received: (qmail 9549 invoked from network); 24 Sep 1997 15:35:50 -0000 Received: from segate.sunet.se (192.36.125.6) by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with SMTP; 24 Sep 1997 15:35:50 -0000 Received: from segate.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <10.BD0DCDE0@SEGATE.SUNET.SE>; Wed, 24 Sep 1997 17:35:39 +0100 Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 10:07:35 -0600 Reply-To: mark.vines@wholefoods.com Sender: Lojban list From: Mark Vines Subject: Re: RV: na'e entails na? X-To: LOJBAN@CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU To: Veijo Vilva In-Reply-To: And Rosta "Re: RV: na'e entails na?" (Sep 24, 3:40pm) Content-Length: 810 Lines: 25 Message-ID: coi doi lobypli la .and. cusku di'e > For example, everyone is either citizen of France > or citizen of some other country. [NB INCLUSIVE OR] > I want to describe the latter group as "na`e fraso > zei selgugde" [I'm taking x1 of selgugde to be a > citizen]. But since for example someone can be a > citizen of both France and Britain, "na`e fraso zei > selgugde" would not work if it entails "na fraso > zei selgugde". "na fraso ..." gives me everyone who > isn't French, whereas I want everyone who is a > citizen of a country other than France. For that I > would like to use "na`e fraso", but will not be > able to if everyone bar me gets their way! > > --And mi terselpinka di'e Not _everyone_! I still agree with you. But you've been expressing our opinion more clearly than I can. co'omi'e markl.