From LOJBAN@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU  Sat Mar  6 22:53:55 2010
Return-Path: <LOJBAN@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU>
Delivered-To: veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI
Received: (qmail 29820 invoked from network); 23 Sep 1997 14:46:05 -0000
Received: from segate.sunet.se (192.36.125.6)
  by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with SMTP; 23 Sep 1997 14:46:05 -0000
Received: from segate.sunet.se by SEGATE.SUNET.SE (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <14.9F86605F@SEGATE.SUNET.SE>; Tue, 23 Sep 1997 16:45:54 +0100
Date:         Tue, 23 Sep 1997 15:45:03 GMT+0
Reply-To:     And Rosta <a.rosta@UCLAN.AC.UK>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From:         And Rosta <a.rosta@UCLAN.AC.UK>
Organization: University of Central Lancashire
Subject:      Pharisees of the Book of Woldemar
X-To:         LOJBAN@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 472
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <4wd8g6lWGxJ.A.4l.D20kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>

Lee writes:
>     I think Lojban should choose the stronger
>     and more useful interpretation here, even though it is too late to
>     clarify this issue in the books.  That's what errata sheets are for.

Bad idea. The book is now the bible - errata sheets are for typos,
not for substantive changes.
I myself was never in favour of the legislative status of
the book, but LLG has promised that this will be so.

So we are now turned into pharisaical exegetes.

--And