From LOJBAN@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU Fri Sep 19 10:05:01 1997
Message-Id: <199709191504.KAA03305@locke.ccil.org>
Date: Fri Sep 19 10:05:01 1997
Reply-To: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
Subject:      Re: Morphology
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
X-Mozilla-Status: 0011
Content-Length:  471


> But it is forbidden to stress a cmavo syllable before a gismu unless you
> put a compulsory pause after the cmavo, so strong disambiguation is
> maintained.

Is that right?  In fact, is it stronger in that before gismu or lujvo there
must be a pause?  How about cmene?

> > "lo RE spa JI pci" and this can be either
> > "lo RE spaJIPci" with a stressed cmavo or "lo REspa JIPci" as two gismu.

So it must be "lo RE. spaJIPci" v. "lo REspa JIPci".  Cool.