Date: Tue, 14 Oct 1997 15:08:29 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199710142008.PAA00222@locke.ccil.org> Reply-To: And Rosta Sender: Lojban list From: And Rosta Organization: University of Central Lancashire Subject: Re: Not just. To: LOJBAN@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 Content-Length: 526 Lines: 16 > indicates that the predication holds > for X and that there is at least one other X' that is also true. po`onai. I thought it was you who came up with that. > And just to complete the quadruple, there is "not even X" that is like 'non-', > but X is false and all other X' are also > false. I'll leave that for Xorxes to work out. I'm too tired. Be warned: do not start a thread on the meaning of "even". Or, if you do, first read 'Even' by Paul Kay in _Linguistics and Philosophy_ from c. 1991. --And