Date:  Thu, 23 Oct 1997 08:49:02 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199710231349.IAA28313@locke.ccil.org>
Reply-To: "Engdahl, Rod" <engdahl@VISA.COM>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: "Engdahl, Rod" <engdahl@VISA.COM>
Subject:      Re: The design of Lojban
To:         Lojban List <LOJBAN@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu>
X-Mozilla-Status: 0011
Content-Length: 388
Lines: 12

la .djan cusku di'e:.
>la .and. cusku di'e:
>
>> If that lobypli is me, I've decided to try to use only standard
>> baselined Lojban, on the grounds that Lojban Central feels that
>> the interests of Lojban are best served in that way.
>>
>> --co`o, mi`e and
>
>A worthy resolution, but subtly undermined by the signature, I think?
>
Just to clarify my understanding, how so?