Date:  Fri, 17 Oct 1997 18:54:49 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199710172354.SAA11041@locke.ccil.org>
Reply-To: JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS <jorge@INTERMEDIA.COM.AR>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS <jorge@INTERMEDIA.COM.AR>
Subject:      Re: tremau
X-To:         lojban <lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu>
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
Status: OR
X-Mozilla-Status: 0011
Content-Length: 437
X-From-Space-Date: Fri Oct 17 18:54:50 1997
X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU

Chris:
>Could {nu} be defined as {ka fau makau}?

I don't think so.

I'm not too sure how {fau} is supposed to work. If we
assume that {mi klama le zarci fau ko'a} means that
{ko'a nu mi klama le zarci}, then {le nu mi klama
le zarci} would be equivalent to {le jaifau klama be le zarci
bei fai mi}. What you have would be a raised version
of that, and you couldn't use it in a place where you
would use a {le nu ...}.

co'o mi'e xorxes