Date:  Thu, 16 Oct 1997 22:30:13 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199710170330.WAA01205@locke.ccil.org>
Reply-To: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
Subject:      Re: tremau
X-To:         Lojban List <lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu>
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
In-Reply-To:  <199710162335.RAA28678@indra.com>
X-Mozilla-Status: 0011
Content-Length: 371
Lines: 9

On Thu, 16 Oct 1997, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS wrote:
> >3. Are ni and ka redundant, strictly speaking? Given du`u and nu
> >   and ce`u, is there anything that they can't do but ni and ka
> >   can?
>
> Well, du'u would be redundant to ka, since ce'u is supposed
> to be used with ka. And yes, ni is definitely redundant.

Could {nu} be defined as {ka fau makau}?