Date:  Wed, 15 Oct 1997 11:28:42 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199710151628.LAA12128@locke.ccil.org>
Reply-To: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
Subject:      Re: na'enai
X-To:         "lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu" <lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu>
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
X-Mozilla-Status: 0011
Content-Length: 392
Lines: 13

cu'u la xorxes.
>If na'enai is accepted that would be:
>        na'enai bo ge la djan gi la djim cu pinxe le ckafi
>        Only both John and Jim drink coffee.

I was thinking along the lines of:

    .i ge po'o la djan. gi la djim. pinxe le ckafi

but I'm not confident about how the interaction between "ge" and "po'o" would
 work - in a symbolic logic way.

ni'oco'omi'e dn.