Date:  Thu, 16 Oct 1997 14:34:42 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199710161934.OAA12460@locke.ccil.org>
Reply-To: And Rosta <a.rosta@UCLAN.AC.UK>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: And Rosta <a.rosta@UCLAN.AC.UK>
Organization: University of Central Lancashire
Subject:      Re: Even
X-To:         LOJBAN@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
X-Mozilla-Status: 0011
Content-Length: 501
X-From-Space-Date: Thu Oct 16 14:34:48 1997
X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU

> cu'u la .and.
> >Be warned: do not start a thread on the meaning of "even".
> >Or, if you do, first read 'Even' by Paul Kay in _Linguistics and
> >Philosophy_ from c. 1991.
>
> At first glance "even" doesn't seem to be much different from "only" and
 "non-".
>   What is the problem with it?
>
> ni'oco'omi'e dn.

I hope you will excuse me heeding my own warning... [If you
won't then I could send you a photocopy of the article.]
Still, others such as Jorge are less trepid souls than me...

--And