Date:  Sun, 30 Nov 1997 17:31:25 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199711302231.RAA12013@locke.ccil.org>
Reply-To: Lee Daniel Crocker <lee@piclab.com>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: "Lee Daniel Crocker (none)" <lcrocker@MERCURY.COLOSSUS.NET>
Organization: Piclab (http://www.piclab.com/)
Subject:      Re: dacti
X-To:         Lojban Group <lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu>
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
In-Reply-To:  <199711301409.GAA05452@red.colossus.net> from "JORGE JOAQUIN
              LLAMBIAS" at Nov 28, 97 10:34:16 pm
Status: OR
X-Mozilla-Status: 0011
Content-Length: 361
X-From-Space-Date: Sun Nov 30 17:31:40 1997
X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU

> >If you interpret the words "object enduring in space time" to include
> >abstarctions, we need a better wording of the definition.
>
> Well, yes, if dacti is supposed to be more restricted than that, then
> a clearer definition might be in order.

My copy of the gi'uste says "material object", which seems pretty
clear to me that actual matter is required.