Message-ID: <34622B64.370E@locke.ccil.org>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 1997 15:41:08 -0500
From: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
Organization: Lojban Peripheral
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (WinNT; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Lojban List <lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu>
Subject: Re: "will", "le mi..."
References: <199711062010.PAA13567@locke.ccil.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mozilla-Status: 0011
Content-Length: 633
X-From-Space-Date: Thu Nov 06 15:41:08 1997
X-From-Space-Address: -

Lee Daniel Crocker (none) wrote:

> I was all prepared to explain why {le do djica} is not
> "what you desire" but "the desirer(s) associated with you",
> but I can't find in the refgram the explanation of the
> shortcut-possesives like {le mi karce}, etc. (though that
> particular example occurs in the chapter on relative clauses,
> while explaining something else).  I know I've seen those
> explained, but I just can't find it.

Chapter 8, Section 7 ("Possessive sumti")
<http://xiron.pc.helsinki.fi/lojftp/reference-grammar/chap8.html#s7>

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan@ccil.org
			e'osai ko sarji la lojban