Date:  Thu, 6 Nov 1997 16:44:23 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199711062144.QAA17302@locke.ccil.org>
Reply-To: John Cowan <cowan@DRV.CBC.COM>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: John Cowan <cowan@DRV.CBC.COM>
Organization: Lojban Peripheral
Subject:      Re: "will", "le mi..."
X-To:         Lojban List <lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu>
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
X-Mozilla-Status: 0011
Content-Length: 670
X-From-Space-Date: Thu Nov  6 16:45:06 1997
X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU

Lee Daniel Crocker (none) wrote:

> I was all prepared to explain why {le do djica} is not
> "what you desire" but "the desirer(s) associated with you",
> but I can't find in the refgram the explanation of the
> shortcut-possesives like {le mi karce}, etc. (though that
> particular example occurs in the chapter on relative clauses,
> while explaining something else).  I know I've seen those
> explained, but I just can't find it.

Chapter 8, Section 7 ("Possessive sumti")
<http://xiron.pc.helsinki.fi/lojftp/reference-grammar/chap8.html#s7>

--
John Cowan      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              cowan@ccil.org
                        e'osai ko sarji la lojban