Date:  Fri, 12 Dec 1997 19:13:15 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199712130013.TAA24939@locke.ccil.org>
Reply-To: JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS <jorge@INTERMEDIA.COM.AR>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS <jorge@INTERMEDIA.COM.AR>
Subject:      Re: Carl Burke's question
X-To:         lojban <lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu>
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
Status: OR
X-Mozilla-Status: 0011
Content-Length: 618
X-From-Space-Date: Fri Dec 12 19:13:33 1997
X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU

>>i tai ma la lojban ckape le nu le se bangrxesperanto cu nanmu
>>Kiel minacas Lojxbano la virecon de la esperantistoj?
>>How does Lojban threaten the manhood of Esperantists?
>
>Assuming 'tai' binds a single sumti, and substituting
>'ka' for 'nu', it makes sense.

Yes, tai binds a single sumti. Remember that {nu} works for
states as well, which is sometimes obscured by the term "event".

>>i mo le se bangrxesperanto pe secau le ka nanmu
>>Kaj kio pri la esperantistoj sen vireco?
>>And what about those esperantists without manhood?
>
>still processing...

Hint: some Esperantists are female...

co'o mi'e xorxes