Date:  Fri, 5 Dec 1997 19:10:06 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199712060010.TAA09206@locke.ccil.org>
Reply-To: JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS <jorge@INTERMEDIA.COM.AR>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS <jorge@INTERMEDIA.COM.AR>
Subject:      Re: semisummary: countability
X-To:         lojban <lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu>
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
Status: O
X-Mozilla-Status: 0011
Content-Length: 582
X-From-Space-Date: Fri Dec  5 19:10:19 1997
X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU

And:
>However, does {valsi} mean (a) "is a single word", or does it
>mean (b) "is wordage"?
 >
 >Under (a), {re da cu valsi} it would mean "Each of two things
>is a single word". Under (b) it would mean "Each of two
>things is wordage, and the two things are differentiated from
>other individuals by virtue of each being a single word".

A couple of questions:

1) If {[piro] lei re valsi cu valsi} is true, then is {[piro] lei re valsi}
a member of {lo'i valsi}?

2) If two words are wordage, is half a word wordage too?
i xu zoi gy thr gy cu valsi bau le glico

co'o mi'e xorxes