Date:  Mon, 8 Dec 1997 19:13:40 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199712090013.TAA28581@locke.ccil.org>
Reply-To: JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS <jorge@INTERMEDIA.COM.AR>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS <jorge@INTERMEDIA.COM.AR>
Subject:      Re: Carl Burke's question
X-To:         lojban <lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu>
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
X-Mozilla-Status: 0011
Content-Length: 577
X-From-Space-Date: Mon Dec  8 19:13:42 1997
X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU

cu'u la karl
>(Whether it succeeded as a translation or not, at least it got an
Esperantist
>on the MST newsgroup to admit that Loglan/lojban is the only conlang that
>threatens the manhood of Esperantists.  :)  So, _something_ was
communicated.)

i tai ma la lojban ckape le nu le se bangrxesperanto cu nanmu
Kiel minacas Lojxbano la virecon de la esperantistoj?
How does Lojban threaten the manhood of Esperantists?

i mo le se bangrxesperanto pe secau le ka nanmu
Kaj kio pri la esperantistoj sen vireco?
And what about those esperantists without manhood?

co'o mi'e xorxes