Date: Thu, 11 Dec 1997 13:19:34 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199712111819.NAA25176@locke.ccil.org> Reply-To: Lee Daniel Crocker Sender: Lojban list From: "Lee Daniel Crocker (none)" Organization: Piclab (http://www.piclab.com/) Subject: Lists X-To: Lojban Group To: John Cowan In-Reply-To: <199712111153.DAA24917@red.colossus.net> from "Logical Language Group" at Dec 11, 97 06:49:36 am X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 Content-Length: 1005 X-From-Space-Date: Thu Dec 11 13:19:38 1997 X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU > The problem is that with the bulk of active Lojbanistanis in theory > watching this discussion, the very act of debating the issue will skew > the answer to the issue. Which is one reason why I want more usage > and less debate. That's a good point, and gives me a different idea for the list. The response to my new list offer was spectacularly underwhelming, but maybe it would be better if we split the list this way: let the current list be used for official announcements, general discussion /in/ Lojban, style, etc. Create another list, say "lojban-tech", strictly for debates among those of us who enjoy working out the excruciating details about exactly what {ni} and {jei} are supposed to mean. -- Lee Daniel Crocker "All inventions or works of authorship original to me, herein and past, are placed irrevocably in the public domain, and may be used or modified for any purpose, without permission, attribution, or notification."--LDC