Date: Fri, 5 Dec 1997 14:49:40 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199712051949.OAA29382@locke.ccil.org> Reply-To: bob@rattlesnake.com Sender: Lojban list From: bob@MEGALITH.RATTLESNAKE.COM Subject: Re: Are tanru really metaphors? X-To: lojban@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU To: John Cowan In-Reply-To: (message from Ronald Hale-Evans on Fri, 5 Dec 1997 04:16:16 -0800) X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 Content-Length: 1530 X-From-Space-Date: Fri Dec 5 14:49:54 1997 X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU ... how to express kennings in Lojban, such as "flame of battle" for "sword"... One solution is mentioned in chapter 13 of the refgram: Alone among the cmavo of selma'o UI, {pe'a} has a rafsi, namely {pev}. This rafsi is used in forming figurative (culturally dependent) lujvo, whose place structure need have nothing to do with the place structure of the components. Perhaps: pevjamnafagri figurative-war-type-of-fire/flame or pevdambafagri figurative-fighter-type-of-fire/flame * fire, x1 is a fire/flame in fuel x2 burning-in/reacting-with oxidizer x3 (default air/oxygen) /:/ /=/ fagri (fag) * fight, x1 fight-s/combats/struggles with x2 over issue x3 (abstract); x1 is a fighter/combatant /:/ [use x3 tu'a for fight over an object/objective] /=/ damba (dab da'a) * war, x1 (person/mass) wars against x2 over territory/matter x3; x1 is at war with x2 /:/ /=/ jamna (jam) Another solution would be prefix all your utterances with {pe'a}, thus telling listeners to interpret what follows figuratively. pe'a PEhA start figurative start figurative (non-literal) speech/text po'a POhA end figurative end figurative (non-literal) speech/text -- Robert J. Chassell bob@rattlesnake.com P. O. Box 693 bob@ai.mit.edu Stockbridge, MA 01262-0693 USA (413) 298-4725