Date:  Fri, 23 Jan 1998 17:10:26 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199801232210.RAA18753@locke.ccil.org>
Reply-To: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Subject:      Re: Summary so far on DJUNO
X-To:         jorge@INTERMEDIA.COM.AR
X-cc:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
X-UIDL: a489c687a248a02dee04c79464b980ef
Status: OR
X-Mozilla-Status: 0011
Content-Length: 391
X-From-Space-Date: Mon Jan 26 12:40:29 1998
X-From-Space-Address: -

>My personal point of view is that the use of every word involves
>some metaphysics behind it, and there is nothing particularly
>special about {fatci} in that respect. We might as well argue why
>{blanu} or {remna} or {sfofa} don't have a metaphysics place as
>well. Are those words totally useless too?

They potentially have such a place - there is a BAI tag for the x4 of
djuno.

lojbab