Date:  Fri, 23 Jan 1998 18:35:21 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199801232335.SAA23006@locke.ccil.org>
Reply-To: "=?iso-8859-1?Q?Jorge_J._Llamb=EDas?=" <jorge@INTERMEDIA.COM.AR>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: "=?iso-8859-1?Q?Jorge_J._Llamb=EDas?=" <jorge@INTERMEDIA.COM.AR>
Subject:      Re: Summary so far on DJUNO
X-To:         lojban <lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu>
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
X-UIDL: e19c506e191f513767d1b0a569625d6c
Status: OR
X-Mozilla-Status: 0011
Content-Length: 368
X-From-Space-Date: Mon Jan 26 12:41:00 1998
X-From-Space-Address: -

>> We might as well argue why
>>{blanu} or {remna} or {sfofa} don't have a metaphysics place as
>>well. Are those words totally useless too?
>
>They potentially have such a place - there is a BAI tag for the x4 of
>djuno.

And doesn't {fatci} potentially have such a place?

If yes, why is {fatci} totally useless but not the others? If no, why not?

co'o mi'e xorxes