Date:  Fri, 16 Jan 1998 16:51:14 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 1998 16:42:11 -0500 (EST)
From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@access.digex.net>
Message-Id: <199801162142.QAA08328@access2.digex.net>
To: cowan@locke.ccil.org
Subject: Re: Knowledge and belief
Cc: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
X-UIDL: 4aeda1592db56bfbd85ea46078cb1cbe
Status: OR
X-Mozilla-Status: 0011
Content-Length: 762
X-From-Space-Date: Tue Jan 20 09:44:46 1998
X-From-Space-Address: -

Cowan:
>> Do any of these questions tell us anything meaningful about what djuno means
>> I am convinced that they do not, by epistemology of their omission of any
>> discussion of the relevance of epistemology whether stated or unstated from
>> a Lojbabn djuno sentence.
>
>These points are quite independent of epistemology.  So I disagree
>with a point of your posting, making your second example true.
>But I like "Lojbabn", which is obviously a mental hash-collision
>between "Lojban" and "Lojbab", with the implicit meaning "Lojban
>by Lojbab".

Actually it was just a typo - one I make rather frequently - cause by the
collocation of the b and n keys.  I hit both when trying to hit the n.,
(as I just now did with the period and the comma keys).

lojbab