Date:  Wed, 28 Jan 1998 18:34:36 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199801282334.SAA10688@locke.ccil.org>
Reply-To: "=?iso-8859-1?Q?Jorge_J._Llamb=EDas?=" <jorge@INTERMEDIA.COM.AR>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: "=?iso-8859-1?Q?Jorge_J._Llamb=EDas?=" <jorge@INTERMEDIA.COM.AR>
Subject:      Re: fuzzy bears
X-To:         lojban <lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu>
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
X-UIDL: dc9876a88c4678a556facff3dcbf1c13
X-Mozilla-Status: 8011
X-From-Space-Date: Thu Jan 29 12:34:53 1998
X-From-Space-Address: -

And:
>>         i le ci cribe goi ko'a cu sipna
 >>         i ko'a vreta le ko'a ckana
 >>
 > To me it means
>
>   "Ax, x in a certain set: x is a bear, x is referent of "ko`a",
>     x lies on x's bed.

Sounds like that right choice.

>Change the example to:
>
>         i le ci cribe ku goi ko'a cu sipna
>         i ko'a vreta le ko'a ckana
>
>and I would understand it as saying that the set/group is referent
>of "ko`a", & therefore that the whole group lies on the whole
>group`s beds. I.e. a kind of massification.

Yes, I suppose. And the same for {ko'a goi le ci cribe}?
I don't like having to use {ku}.

co'o mi'e xorxes