Date:  Mon, 5 Jan 1998 10:51:20 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199801051551.KAA11724@locke.ccil.org>
Reply-To: mark.vines@wholefoods.com
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: Mark Vines <vinesm@wholefoods.com>
Subject:      Re: <djuno> and <viska>
X-To:         LOJBAN@CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
In-Reply-To:  Steven Belknap <sbelknap@uic.edu> "Re: <djuno> and <viska>" (Jan 
              3, 12:30am)
X-Mozilla-Status: 0011
Content-Length: 585
X-From-Space-Date: Mon Jan  5 10:51:21 1998
X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU

la stivn. spuda mi di'e

> > I might equally say, "I said the catcher knew that the
> > pitcher threw the ball, but now I realize that I was
> > wrong."  If such a disclaimer was warranted, would you have
> > any problem with that?
>
> Your statement is ambiguous in English. Do you mean that you
> were wrong about what the catcher knew or what you said?

mi spuda la stivn di'e

Sorry, but I don't understand.  When what I said was
a statement about what the catcher knew, how is being
wrong about what the catcher knew different from
being wrong about what I said?

co'omi'e markl.