X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 Message-ID: <34F2FFBA.E4B98420@locke.ccil.org> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 1998 12:13:31 -0500 From: John Cowan Organization: Lojban Peripheral X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (WinNT; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lojban List Subject: Re: Summary so far on DJUNO References: <199802241700.MAA23863@locke.ccil.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From-Space-Date: Tue Feb 24 12:13:34 1998 X-From-Space-Address: - And Rosta wrote: > A better comparison would be with {viska}, which necessarily involves > the eyes or other visual organs, but has no syntactic sumti place for > the eyes. Well, not quite. Some organism x1 might be able to see without actually having a visual organ; it might have fully distributed visual reception. (I think this is actually true of some single-celled creatures.) -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn. You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn. Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (FW 16.5)