Date:  Sat, 14 Feb 1998 10:08:58 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199802141508.KAA08960@locke.ccil.org>
Reply-To: Goran Topic <amadan@USA.NET>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: Goran Topic <amadan@USA.NET>
Organization: Free Minds Discorporated
Subject:      Re: more epistemic perversity
X-To:         Lojban Listserver <lojban@cuvmb.columbia.edu>
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
X-UIDL: 15fff79c5a332519344cf6286d03e94b
X-Mozilla-Status: 8011
X-From-Space-Date: Tue Feb 17 10:16:01 1998
X-From-Space-Address: -

> > But if the two versions of knowledge are
> >equally likely to be real-world, we do not find the use of "know" so odd:
> >
> >John knows that Pete has 2 kids, but Jim knows that Pete has 3 kids.  Which
> >is really true, I can't say.
>
> I find that sentence very odd. If it were normal then "know" would not
> have presupposition of truth, I agree with that, but it isn't normal as
> far as I can tell.

.i mi ji'a go'i
.i mi bangu rarna djica tu'a zoi gy. thinks .gy.

co'o mi'e. goran.