Date:  Thu, 9 Apr 1998 02:02:24 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199804090602.CAA26139@locke.ccil.org>
Reply-To: Lionel Bonnetier <leo@EASYNET.FR>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: Lionel Bonnetier <leo@EASYNET.FR>
Subject:      [lojban] ratni xa
X-To:         Lojban ML <lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu>
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
X-UIDL: 3e550f9014e564398bf5bbaff85ef68d
X-Mozilla-Status: 8003
X-From-Space-Date: Thu Apr 09 12:15:36 1998
X-From-Space-Address: -

A few questions for your benevolence. Are they already answered in some
documents I haven't found yet?

Is {tabgreku ratstura} a translation clear enough for 'a carbon-frame molecule'?

Do I have to translate C14 as {ratni xa fi pavo}, since {ratni xa pavo}
could be confused with {ratni xapavo} -- even if so heavy an element hasn't
been discovered yet.

Is it generally recommended to use {ratni <number>} rather than a standalone
word in scientific papers?

Is {skevalsi} understandable as a title for a science lexicon?

Thank you.

   Lionel Bonnetier <leo@easynet.fr>   Ph: +33 478 601 862