Received: from spooler by stryx.demon.co.uk (Mercury/32 v2.01); 13 Jun 98 21:30:46 +0000 Return-path: Received: from punt-11.mail.demon.net (194.217.242.34) by stryx.demon.co.uk (Mercury/32 v2.01); 13 Jun 98 21:30:41 +0000 Received: from punt-1.mail.demon.net by mailstore for ia@stryx.demon.co.uk id 897755794:10:21852:2; Sat, 13 Jun 98 16:36:34 GMT Received: from listserv.cuny.edu ([128.228.100.10]) by punt-1.mail.demon.net id aa1101830; 13 Jun 98 16:36 GMT Received: from listserv (listserv.cuny.edu) by listserv.cuny.edu (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id <1.FE961AAD@listserv.cuny.edu>; Sat, 13 Jun 1998 12:38:06 -0400 Date: Sat, 13 Jun 1998 13:29:17 -0300 Reply-To: "=?iso-8859-1?Q?Jorge_J._Llamb=EDas?=" Sender: Lojban list From: "=?iso-8859-1?Q?Jorge_J._Llamb=EDas?=" Subject: Re: loi jei loi nu klama cu muvdu X-To: lojban To: Multiple recipients of list LOJBAN Message-ID: <897755778.111830.0@listserv.cuny.edu> X-PMFLAGS: 33554560 7 Content-Length: 4168 Lines: 93 Lojbab: >> le gerku cu cmoni mo'izu'a le tricu > >My intention, if not contradicted by the Book, was > > The dog barks, while moving to the left from (at/near/the > direction of) the tree. > le nu le gerku cu cmoni cu klama le zunle > [fe] le zunle [be le tricu] > [fi] le tricu > >with the following useful application > > le gerku cu cmoni mo'iru'u le tricu > The dog barks while running around the tree > le gerku cu cmoni mo'ifa'a le tricu > The dog barks while running toward the tree. > >etc. The tagged sumti in effect becomes a secondary space-time reference >(secondary, because the primary space-time reference will determine what >direction "to the left from the tree"is. I agree with your interpretations of both {mo'iru'u} and {mo'ifa'a}, but I don't understand why you call them applications of the rule you give for {mo'izu'a}, they don't follow that rule, they follow the rule I was giving (i.e. that mo'i tags the ve muvdu, not the se muvdu): le gerku cu cmoni mo'iru'u le tricu The dog barks while moving around the tree. le nu le gerku cu cmoni cu muvdu _fo_ le sruri be le tricu The dog's barking happens moving along a path that surrounds the tree. le gerku cu cmoni mo'ifa'a le tricu The dog barks while moving toward the tree. le nu le gerku cu cmoni cu muvdu _fo_ le selfa'a be le tricu The dog's barking happens moving along a path that is directed towards the tree. Using for {mo'iru'u} the rule you give for {mo'izu'a} we'd get instead: le nu le gerku cu cmoni cu muvdu [fe] le sruri [be le tricu] [fi] le tricu The dog's barking happens moving to the surrounding of the tree from the tree. I think we all agree that that one is wrong. The interpretation that you want for {mo'izu'a} is obtained with my interpretation in this way: le gerku cu cmoni mo'izu'afa'a je mo'ito'o le tricu The dog barks moving towards the left of, and away from, the tree. Here is another interesting pair: le gerku cu cmoni mo'ine'i le zdani The dog barks moving inside the house. le nu le gerku cu cmoni cu muvdu fo le nenri be le zdani The dog's barking happens moving along a path that is inside the house. le gerku cu cmoni mo'ine'ifa'a le zdani The dog barks moving into the house. le nu le gerku cu cmoni cu muvdu fo le selfa'a be le nenri be le zdani The dog's barking happens moving along a path that is in the direction of the inside of the house. Again, this does not match exactly the glosses in the refgram, which give "moving into" for {mo'ine'i} and do not allow a possibility for "moving inside". In summary, we all seem to agree about the use of {mo'iru'u}, i.e. moving along a path that surrounds the reference. We also agree about {mo'ifa'a}, i.e. moving along a path that is directed towards the reference. But what happens with the FAhA that Colin classifies as -extended? The gloss in the refgram suggests that they incorporate a {fa'a} when used with {mo'i}. So {mo'ine'i} is glossed as "moving into" which is what I would use for {mo'ine'ifa'a}, and {mo'izu'a} is glossed as "moving leftward" which is what I would use for {mo'izu'afa'a}. co'o mi'e xorxes