Received: from spooler by stryx.demon.co.uk (Mercury/32 v2.01); 30 Sep 98 23:09:02 +0000 Return-path: Received: from punt-21.mail.demon.net (194.217.242.6) by stryx.demon.co.uk (Mercury/32 v2.01); 30 Sep 98 23:08:57 +0000 Received: from punt-2.mail.demon.net by mailstore for ia@stryx.demon.co.uk id 907149318:20:13527:0; Wed, 30 Sep 98 09:55:18 GMT Received: from listserv.cuny.edu ([128.228.100.10]) by punt-2.mail.demon.net id aa2013303; 30 Sep 98 9:54 GMT Received: from listserv (listserv.cuny.edu) by listserv.cuny.edu (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id <2.00078A2B@listserv.cuny.edu>; Wed, 30 Sep 1998 5:56:29 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 05:53:56 -0400 Reply-To: Logical Language Group Sender: Lojban list From: Logical Language Group Subject: Re: Textbook Status X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Multiple recipients of list LOJBAN Message-ID: <907149296.2013303.0@listserv.cuny.edu> X-PMFLAGS: 33554560 7 1 Y033F6.CNM Content-Length: 5177 Lines: 111 >On Sep 29, 10:11am, John Arley Burns wrote: >> Logical Language Group writes: >> >> > Monthly status reporting would be meaningless, and quarterly would >> > be nearly so. > >I joined the list last night. Before then I'd been wondering if the >community had fallen apart, as none of the Xiron web pages seemed to have >been modified this year, Please understand that the Xiron Web pages are a volunteer effort on the part of one person, Veijo Vilva, who is able to offer it because he manages a set of machines, including the Xiron machine, that has space for us, and because he(sometimes) has time to work on pages for Lojban. We support Veijo as much as possible, but have no d irect management of the Web site. If you want to see more stuff up on the Web pages, including indications that the project is active, then you have to work with Veijo, and not with "Lojban Central". >and it seemed that the archive of the list had stopped >last year as well. Archiving the list has also been a volunteer function. Several people keep personal archives of the list. John Cowan used to keep a list archive and supply it to Veijo periodically. But I understand that his current ISOP is somewhat unreliable as an arhciving site. If people want a good archive, again again, someone needs to just DO it. I won't ask for things for the Web site, because I almost never go there. Indeed, I use a shell account and lynx for 99% of my net access, and hence almost completely avoid the Web in general. I have no idea what is and is not on the Web site as opposed to what could be there, except to know that Veijo maintains a mirro of our ftp site here at digex, which IS the o fficial repository for Lojban materials, and you can access all those materials from the Web page. All other bells and whistles are Veijo's doing, and I have no idea what is involved, nor find much use for such things. I guess I am saying that looking to me for any improvement in our Web page is not gonna happen. >The basic meaning of a monthly status report is that someone is still around >to give the report. The place to find out the status of the project is Lojban List, so you have come to the right place. I understand what you are saying, but I know that a monthly LLG status repor t would be such that we would only change the date. It sounds hard to arsh, but I will not be bothered to perform such an exercise, nor to bug Veijo to perform it for us. If I have news tro report, I do report it - here on Lojban List. If you want to remain current, you will have to subscribe either continuously o be. I recognize that not everyone can do so - they have other commitments inm their lives. But we also have other commitments in our lives. No one is paying us to produce Lojban materials, and indeed the organization is a drain on my finance s most of the time. We would probably need about 4 to 5 times the current active paying subscribership in order to change this, along with a lot more people donating money on a regular basis. >I'd also hoped to see mention of a dictionary by now, but didn't. There is a dictionary file on the ftp site in draft form. based on the decisions that have been made by LogFest, the printed dictionary will probably have less, and not more, than the current contents of that file. The pocket dictionary which will come out first, wuill have MUCH less than that file. This for people who are on-line, you are best off downloading that file, and setting up a display/search routine to access it efficiently. The bottom linme is that the reason there is so little news is because the langu age is NOT changing any more. We have successfully baselined it and 95% of our core materials will remain unchanged for the next 5 years or more. We WANT the Web pages to be unchanged, insofar as they describe the language. Every thing else is for aesthetic purposes only. I will reiterate that when I am producing a regular status report on the project project again, it will be written primaril y for paying subscribers. We will probably make it available on the net on some basis, but that will not be the priority. My apologies if this comes across undiplomatically - I've been up all night (my most common way to get tiome to work on Lojban). lojbab ---- lojbab lojbab@access.digex.net Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc. 2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273 Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: ftp.access.digex.net /pub/access/lojbab or see Lojban WWW Server: href="http://xiron.pc.helsinki.fi/lojban/" Order _The Complete Lojban Language_ - see our Web pages or ask me.