Received: from spooler by stryx.demon.co.uk (Mercury/32 v2.01); 28 Sep 98 00:37:40 +0000 Return-path: Received: from punt-11.mail.demon.net (194.217.242.34) by stryx.demon.co.uk (Mercury/32 v2.01); 28 Sep 98 00:37:30 +0000 Received: from punt-1.mail.demon.net by mailstore for ia@stryx.demon.co.uk id 906481282:10:04158:14; Tue, 22 Sep 98 16:21:22 GMT Received: from listserv.cuny.edu ([128.228.100.10]) by punt-1.mail.demon.net id aa1107904; 22 Sep 98 16:21 GMT Received: from listserv (listserv.cuny.edu) by listserv.cuny.edu (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id <3.FFA53F6F@listserv.cuny.edu>; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 12:22:28 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 12:18:09 -0400 Reply-To: Logical Language Group Sender: Lojban list From: Logical Language Group Subject: Re: Online learning (kinda) X-To: kingcats@EARTHLINK.NET X-cc: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Multiple recipients of list LOJBAN Message-ID: <906481267.117904.0@listserv.cuny.edu> X-PMFLAGS: 33554560 7 1 Y053C1.CNM Content-Length: 1739 Lines: 34 >Ok, so now I need: > >A list of words that most need memorizing. The gismu list has a plausible ordering. Along around column 157 of each line is a <=4 digit number. This is a frequency of occurence of that gismu in the complete text archive as of a few years ago. Some words that appear often in discussions about Lojban like "bridi" and sumti get high counts because the text archove includes discussion of the texts. In addition "since" is overrated because it matches an English word is such counting. But for the most part this frequency count is a good guide for when to learn the words. The letter codes in the following columns (160, I think) also can serve a s a plausible ordering. There is a number and a letter, which corresponds to the lesson and sublesson in the original draft textbook outline. This outline is now obsolete (indeed, I wrote 6 lessons according to the original outline, but John Cowan has reworganized these 6 lessons into 21 or 22 in the current posted draft, and the ordering of those 20+ lessons does not necessarily tracj to the original outline - though it probably is pretty close). However it serves as a benchmark of MY best guess at one time about an order in which the words could/should be learned. But the frequency count is probably more objective, even if perhaps a bit skewed by the lack of variety in early Lojban texts. lojbab