Received: from spooler by stryx.demon.co.uk (Mercury/32 v2.01); 28 Sep 98 00:37:40 +0000 Return-path: Received: from punt-11.mail.demon.net (194.217.242.34) by stryx.demon.co.uk (Mercury/32 v2.01); 28 Sep 98 00:37:29 +0000 Received: from punt-1.mail.demon.net by mailstore for ia@stryx.demon.co.uk id 906480507:10:24392:6; Tue, 22 Sep 98 16:08:27 GMT Received: from listserv.cuny.edu ([128.228.100.10]) by punt-1.mail.demon.net id aa1121083; 22 Sep 98 16:07 GMT Received: from listserv (listserv.cuny.edu) by listserv.cuny.edu (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id <3.FFA53EC6@listserv.cuny.edu>; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 12:09:20 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 12:07:33 -0400 Reply-To: Logical Language Group Sender: Lojban list From: Logical Language Group Subject: Re: negative lujvo X-To: robin@BILKENT.EDU.TR X-cc: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Multiple recipients of list LOJBAN Message-ID: <906480479.1121083.0@listserv.cuny.edu> X-PMFLAGS: 33554560 7 1 Y002F5.CNM Content-Length: 830 Lines: 22 >I was trying to come up with a word for "rude" and found there was no >gismu. Presumably you could use "na'e clite", but if you try to follow >the rule to make it into a lujvo, you get "nallit", which is malformed. >Would you then say "nalclite"? Yes. >And what would you do in a case where >both the gismu and the rafsi start with L? y-hyphen. As an example (thoutgh there is a shorter form based on a short rafsi), a valid lujvo is nalylujvo (presumably all words that are not lujvo). lojbab