Received: from spooler by stryx.demon.co.uk (Mercury/32 v2.01); 28 Sep 98 00:46:23 +0000
Return-path: <LOJBAN@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu>
Received: from punt-11.mail.demon.net (194.217.242.34) by stryx.demon.co.uk (Mercury/32 v2.01);
   28 Sep 98 00:46:18 +0000
Received: from punt-1.mail.demon.net by mailstore for ia@stryx.demon.co.uk
          id 906744496:10:26810:1; Fri, 25 Sep 98 17:28:16 GMT
Received: from listserv.cuny.edu ([128.228.100.10]) by punt-1.mail.demon.net
           id aa1026502; 25 Sep 98 17:27 GMT
Received: from listserv (listserv.cuny.edu) by listserv.cuny.edu (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id <2.00073A6B@listserv.cuny.edu>; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 11:55:29 -0400
Date:         Fri, 25 Sep 1998 11:53:56 -0400
Reply-To:     Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From:         Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Subject:      Re: word frequency list coming
X-To:         kingcats@EARTHLINK.NET
X-cc:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To:           Multiple recipients of list LOJBAN <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
Message-ID: <906744457.1026502.0@listserv.cuny.edu>
X-PMFLAGS: 33554560 7 1 Y07124.CNM
Content-Length: 964
Lines: 20



>On the subject of a phonographer, if said individual had the ability to make
>wav files on their system and mail them to me, they wouldn't actually have to
>be in Denver.  This would make sense, also, from the standpoint that it might
>not be a bad idea to review the pronunciation of the words before release of
>the recordings.

If I recall, Veijo put a version of our recording up on the Lojban Web Page,
which has word and conversation samples spoken by 4 different people.
I would think that you could extract phoneme sounds as well as examples of
what passes here for "good pronunciation" from that recording.

lojbab