Received: from spooler by stryx.demon.co.uk (Mercury/32 v2.01); 30 Nov 98 00:37:30 +0000 Return-path: Received: from punt-11.mail.demon.net (194.217.242.34) by stryx.demon.co.uk (Mercury/32 v2.01); 30 Nov 98 00:37:24 +0000 Received: from punt-1.mail.demon.net by mailstore for ia@stryx.demon.co.uk id 912341115:10:28814:0; Sun, 29 Nov 98 12:05:15 GMT Received: from pop.onelist.com ([209.207.135.253]) by punt-1.mail.demon.net id ab1112034; 29 Nov 98 12:05 GMT Received: (qmail 3535 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 1998 12:04:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 3501 invoked from network); 29 Nov 1998 12:04:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO inca.cgnet.com.br) (200.241.195.17) by pop.onelist.com with SMTP; 29 Nov 1998 12:04:45 -0000 Received: from inca.cgnet.com.br ([200.241.195.136]) by inca.cgnet.com.br (8.8.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id JAA00761 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 1998 09:07:05 -0300 Date: Sun, 29 Nov 1998 09:07:05 -0300 Message-Id: <199811291207.JAA00761@inca.cgnet.com.br> From: Gustavo Eulalio To: Lojban Mailing List In-Reply-To: <199811281442.JAA29822@access5.digex.net> References: <199811281442.JAA29822@access5.digex.net> X-Mailer: Becky! ver 1.24 Mailing-List: list lojban@onelist.com; contact lojban-owner@onelist.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@onelist.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Subject: [lojban] Re: Descriptors X-PMFLAGS: 34078848 7 1 Y06930.CNM Content-Length: 2039 Lines: 49 From: Gustavo Eulalio On: Sat, 28 Nov 1998 09:42:39 -0500 (EST) Logical Language Group wrote: =---------=---------=---------=---------= > Seeing Robin's answer, I think I understand the question better. > The reference grammar wording is better than the suggested alternative, > and there is indeed a difference. > > In the "lei" example there is a set with 3 members that is being > massified. The set is identified by having its elements described as dogs. > There is no indication that the set is a complete set of all things that > the speaker describes as dogs. Likewise for le'i, the set may not include > all that the speaker would so describe. > > A complete wording would then be > > a set/mass (as appropriate) I have in mind whose members/components I > describe as I guess you didn't get it yet, Bob. Your wording contradicts the book's one. Maybe I can explain my doubt better with an example. If I say "lei prenu", will I be calling the mass "the persons" or "the crowd"? If I have understood it correctly, it is "the crowd", and "lei" will then mean "... a mass of those I describe as... ", or, as you say, "... a mass whose components I describe as ..." co'o mi'e guctav. -- ________ Gustavo Eulalio (g.eu@i.am) | ______| Homepage: http://i.am/g.eu/ | | ____ .-------------------------------. | | |__ | | "Minha lngua minha Ptria" | | | __| | | Fernando Pessoa | |_| |____| |_______________________________| /"\ \ / CAMPANHA DA FITA ASCII - CONTRA MAIL HTML X ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN - AGAINST HTML MAIL / \ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from this mailing list, or to change your subscription to digest, go to the ONElist web site, at http://www.onelist.com and select the User Center link from the menu bar on the left. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com