Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 22:04:39 -0500 (EST)
From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@access.digex.net>
Message-Id: <199811120304.WAA12240@access1.digex.net>
To: hezekiah@CS.UTEXAS.EDU
Cc: lojban@onelist.com
Mailing-List: list lojban@onelist.com; contact lojban-owner@onelist.com
Precedence: bulk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: [lojban] Re: lujvo preti
Content-Length: 927
Lines: 21


From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@access.digex.net>

>Can the lujvo 'tolxamgu' can be in English as "bad",
>and 'nalxamgu' as "not-good"? I am trying to understand the
>application of polar vs. scalar negation.

I would take tolxamgu as being not merely bad, but as far from good as
possible on the unspecified scale.  nalxamgu is also "bad", but is more
akin to xlali - having the full range of other-than-good.  The typical
English semantics of "not good" can include either na'e xamgu or no'e
xamgu.  A "C" grade on a test is not good, but neither is it bad (unless
you fall short of honors or grad school admission as a result).

lojbab

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help support ONElist, while generating interest in your product or
service. ONElist has a variety of advertising packages. Visit
http://www.onelist.com/advert.html for more information.