Received: from spooler by stryx.demon.co.uk (Mercury/32 v2.01); 21 Dec 98 20:16:27 +0000 Return-path: Received: from punt-11.mail.demon.net (194.217.242.34) by stryx.demon.co.uk (Mercury/32 v2.01); 21 Dec 98 20:16:19 +0000 Received: from punt-1.mail.demon.net by mailstore for ia@stryx.demon.co.uk id 914227910:10:11998:4; Mon, 21 Dec 98 08:11:50 GMT Received: from pop.onelist.com ([209.207.164.209]) by punt-1.mail.demon.net id aa1011783; 21 Dec 98 8:11 GMT Received: (qmail 24886 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 1998 08:12:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 24877 invoked from network); 21 Dec 1998 08:12:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO stmpy.cais.net) (199.0.216.101) by pop.onelist.com with SMTP; 21 Dec 1998 08:12:55 -0000 Received: from bob (dynamic79.cl7.cais.net [205.177.20.79]) by stmpy.cais.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id DAA06672; Mon, 21 Dec 1998 03:10:58 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199812210810.DAA06672@stmpy.cais.net> X-Sender: vir1036@pop.cais.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0 Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1998 03:07:24 -0500 To: Richard Curnow From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" Cc: lojban@onelist.com In-Reply-To: References: <"Bob LeChevalier's message of Mon, 21 Dec 1998 02:00:26 -0500> <199812210704.CAA06313@stmpy.cais.net> Mailing-List: list lojban@onelist.com; contact lojban-owner@onelist.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@onelist.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: [lojban] Re: lujvo making and the 'tosmabru failure' test X-PMFLAGS: 34078848 7 1 Y06FDC.CNM Content-Length: 1530 Lines: 34 From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" At 07:37 AM 12/21/98 +0000, you wrote: >From: Richard Curnow >... > Bob> If a lujvo will fail the "tosmabru" test, then that is the > Bob> location at which it will break. The test is therefore to > Bob> determine whether the remainder of the word, after taking off > Bob> the first CV, is a valid lujvo of its own. > >Agreed, so does the following algorithm achieve the desired effect: > >A. Work through steps 1..4 of the algorithm as in the ref. grammar. > >B. If the candidate lujvo starts with at least one CVC rafsi, consider >the form after removing the initial CV. Working from the left, try to >partition this into valid rafsi (not necessarily at the points where >rafsi were originally joined earlier), possibly with hyphens between >them; if this can be done then the test fails and the lujvo has to >start CVCyC..., otherwise it passes and the extra 'y' is not needed. I think this has the same effect and the book algorithm, but I am anything but a master of algorithm equivalencing. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from this mailing list, or to change your subscription to digest, go to the ONElist web site, at http://www.onelist.com and select the User Center link from the menu bar on the left. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com