Received: from spooler by stryx.demon.co.uk (Mercury/32 v2.01); 21 Dec 98 20:16:16 +0000 Return-path: Received: from punt-21.mail.demon.net (194.217.242.6) by stryx.demon.co.uk (Mercury/32 v2.01); 21 Dec 98 20:16:07 +0000 Received: from punt-2.mail.demon.net by mailstore for ia@stryx.demon.co.uk id 914223876:20:17880:3; Mon, 21 Dec 98 07:04:36 GMT Received: from pop.onelist.com ([209.207.164.159]) by punt-2.mail.demon.net id aa2017805; 21 Dec 98 7:04 GMT Received: (qmail 22540 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 1998 07:14:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 22532 invoked from network); 21 Dec 1998 07:14:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO stmpy.cais.net) (199.0.216.101) by pop.onelist.com with SMTP; 21 Dec 1998 07:14:13 -0000 Received: from bob (dynamic120.cl7.cais.net [205.177.20.120]) by stmpy.cais.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id CAA06313 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 1998 02:04:01 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199812210704.CAA06313@stmpy.cais.net> X-Sender: vir1036@pop.cais.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0 Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1998 02:00:26 -0500 To: lojban@onelist.com From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" In-Reply-To: Mailing-List: list lojban@onelist.com; contact lojban-owner@onelist.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@onelist.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: [lojban] Re: lujvo making and the 'tosmabru failure' test X-PMFLAGS: 34078848 7 1 Y041B0.CNM Content-Length: 2002 Lines: 47 From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" At 10:56 PM 12/20/98 +0000, you wrote: >From: Richard Curnow >I am trying to get to the bottom of the lujvo-making algorithm >described in chapter 4, section 11 of the reference manual, in >particular the test in 5) for 'tosmabru failure'. > >If the candidate lujvo starts CVC CVC CVC ..., and would break into a >cmavo and a shorter brivla, I am struggling to see how it can break >other than after the first CV, leaving the shorter brivla being all >but the initial 2 letters. If a lujvo will fail the "tosmabru" test, then that is the location at which it will break. The test is therefore to determine whether the remainder of the word, after taking off the first CV, is a valid lujvo of its own. I believe the three failure cases can be generalized by representing them as *tosmabru but tofmabru OK requires tosymabru *tostosmabru but toftosmabru OR tostofmabru OK requires tosytosmabru *tostodydru but toftodydru OK requires tosytodydru You should be able to see that a valid lujvo exists if you remove the first two letters in each of the above asterisked words, but that changing ANY of the consonant pairs that would make it seem like a string CVC rafsi makes the word remainder NOT a valid lujvo, as shown in the second example above. If the tosmabru test fails, you MUST stick the y between the first two rafsi; the y may NOT be placed there if the lujvo is valid after checking for tosmabru breakup. Hope this helps. lojbab ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from this mailing list, or to change your subscription to digest, go to the ONElist web site, at http://www.onelist.com and select the User Center link from the menu bar on the left. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com